Thinking Out Loud?... Or Rather, Playing Out Loud?

On May 4, 2023, Grammy Award-winning artist, Ed Sheeran won a lawsuit accusing him copyright

infringement by using the rhythm and chord progression of Marvin Gaye’s famous 1973 hit “Let’s Get It

On” in one of his songs. This lawsuit was originally filed in 2017 by the heirs of the late Ed Townsend, the

co-author of Gaye’s song, claiming that Sheeran, and his record label Warner Music Group, and his

music publisher Sony Music Publishing had infringed on their copyright interest in the Gaye song.

To support the claim of infringement, lawyers for the plaintiff relied on video evidence of Ed Sheeran’s

ability to move effortlessly between his hit ballad “Thinking Out Loud” and Gaye’s famous song “Let’s

Get It On.” To disprove allegations of copying, Sheeran emphasized to the jury that his song was in fact

his own creative work (and not a copy of Gaye’s song) by testifying that his hit song is based on his own

experiences. In addition, Sheeran’s musicologist told jurors that he found 80 songs containing the same

chord progression as “Let’s Get it On,” with 33 coming before Gaye’s song was released. To illustrate

this to the jury, Sheeran played his guitar in the courtroom to demonstrate how similar the basic chord

sequence sounds in numerous famous songs. According to Sheeran and his expert witness, similar chord

progressions and harmonic rhythms between the songs are unoriginal and commonplace musical

elements that are not subject to copyright protection.

The presiding judge reminded the jury that independent creation is an absolute defense to copyright

infringement. After only a few hours of deliberation, the jury unanimously found in favor of Ed Sheeran.

According to Sheeran, these cords are “common building blocks” that are “in songwriters’ alphabet, our

toolkit, and should be there for all of use to use.” Further, he stated “no one owns them, or the way

they are played, in the same way no one owns the color blue.” This case serves as a reminder that the

use of similar chord progressions is likely not sufficient to establish copyright infringement.

At Renner Otto, the oldest intellectual property firm in Cleveland, we specialize in assisting our clients as

they develop efficient Intellectual Property strategies that are tailored to their business’s needs. Our

attorneys are knowledgeable on a wide range of domestic and international IP issues, and we partner

with Firms around the world to better serve our clients.

Someone from the Renner Otto team would be happy to discuss this topic or any related Intellectual

Property matters. Contact us for a complimentary consultation to see how we can help your business

move your innovation forward.

The attorneys at Renner Otto strive to be authorities in all matters concerning the ever-evolving

landscape of Intellectual Property; however, the information provided on our website is not intended to

be legal advice, nor does it create an attorney-client relationship.